<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PA Credit Card Laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com</link>
	<description>Pennsylvania Credit Card Attorney</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:30:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Defective Notice on a Default Judgment</title>
		<link>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/07/defective-notice-on-a-default-judgment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/07/defective-notice-on-a-default-judgment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Artim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collection Agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrow financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[important notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We recently had the pleasure of representing Virginia H on an Allegheny County credit card lawsuit.  Virginia was sued by Arrow Financial earlier this year.  She failed to respond to the lawsuit in time, and a default judgment was entered against her.  She called our office and after a quick review of the docket, we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We recently had the pleasure of representing Virginia H on an Allegheny County credit card lawsuit.  Virginia was sued by Arrow Financial earlier this year.  She failed to respond to the lawsuit in time, and a default judgment was entered against her.  She called our office and after a quick review of the docket, we noticed that the Important Notice that was sent to her was defective in that it contained additional language.  (An Important Notice must be sent by the debt collector if you fail to respond to the lawsuit within 20 days.  This notice affords you an additional 10 days to respond).  We immediately filed a Motion to Strike the Judgment and argument was held before the Honorable Stanton R. Wettick.  Our argument was that the additional language that the debt collector added to the Important Notice was deceiving in that Virginia thought that a judgment had already been entered against her.  Judge Wettick agreed and struck the judgment.  Shortly thereafter,  the judge scheduled an Arbitration hearing and of course, we won as usual.  The reported opinion can be found at the Pittsburgh Legal Journal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/07/defective-notice-on-a-default-judgment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What a week!</title>
		<link>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/07/what-a-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/07/what-a-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Artim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collection agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was a very good week for our firm.  We obtained 4 non-jury verdicts this week on credit card cases.  All of the cases commenced at the Arbitration level of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County. We won all of the hearings at the Arbitration level, and the debt collectors filed appeals on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a very good week for our firm.  We obtained 4 non-jury verdicts this week on credit card cases.  All of the cases commenced at the Arbitration level of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County. We won all of the hearings at the Arbitration level, and the debt collectors filed appeals on all of the cases. The hearings on these appeals were heard this week and we won every single case! </p>
<p>To be fair, its really not a suprise when we win a case, it happens so often, but 4 in one week is pretty good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/07/what-a-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCRA &#8211; Fair Credit Reporting Act</title>
		<link>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/05/fcra-fair-credit-reporting-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/05/fcra-fair-credit-reporting-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 18:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Artim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt collector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair credit reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our client, Lady Z, received a demand letter from a junk debt buyer.  Lady Z contacted us immediately and we sent out a Validation letter.  A Validation letter is a request to the debt collector to authenticate the debt that they allege is due and owing.  The debt collecter in Lady Z&#8217;s case did not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our client, Lady Z, received a demand letter from a junk debt buyer.  Lady Z contacted us immediately and we sent out a Validation letter.  A Validation letter is a request to the debt collector to authenticate the debt that they allege is due and owing.  The debt collecter in Lady Z&#8217;s case did not respond to our request.  By law, they have 30 days to respond to our Validation request.  If they fail to do so, they may make any further attempts to collect on the debt, and, they must mark the client&#8217;s credit record as &#8220;disputed&#8221;. </p>
<p>In this matter, the debt collector failed to do anything that it was required to do by law.  After about 45 days, Lady Z reviewed her credit report and discovered that the debt collector was still reporting this debt as valid, with no dispute listed.  We immediately filed a lawsuit against the debt collector in state court. Within a matter of about 3 weeks, debt collector&#8217;s attorney contacted us and acknowledged the error.  He was willing to eliminate the underlying debt, remove the adverse credit reporting, pay $1000 in statutory damages and pay our attorney fees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/05/fcra-fair-credit-reporting-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suing the Debt Collector</title>
		<link>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/03/suing-the-debt-collector/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/03/suing-the-debt-collector/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Artim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Illegal Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clay Morrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDCPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/?p=158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, March 30, 2010,  there was a fine article published on MSN money regarding suing  an abusive debt collector.  Founding partner at Morrow &#38; Artim, Clay Morrow, was interviewed for the story.  Clay was able to discuss a recent victory where he sued a debt collector after the collector threatened to show up at our clients [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, March 30, 2010,  there was a fine article published on MSN money regarding suing  an abusive debt collector.  Founding partner at Morrow &amp; Artim, Clay Morrow, was interviewed for the story.  Clay was able to discuss a recent victory where he sued a debt collector after the collector threatened to show up at our clients place of employment.   See the link here <a href="http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Banking/YourCreditRating/sue-your-debt-collector.aspx">http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Banking/YourCreditRating/sue-your-debt-collector.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/03/suing-the-debt-collector/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“But I owe the money”</title>
		<link>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/02/%e2%80%9cbut-i-owe-the-money%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/02/%e2%80%9cbut-i-owe-the-money%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Artim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collection Agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collection agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt collection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junk debt buyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/?p=155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We hear this one all the time at our office. People call my office because they have been sued by collection agencies or junk debt buyers on old credit card accounts. I tell them that we can defend the case and most likely win. They often say “But, I owe the money” 
My response to that is no, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We hear this one all the time at our office. People call my office because they have been sued by collection agencies or junk debt buyers on old credit card accounts. I tell them that we can defend the case and most likely win. They often say “But, I owe the money” </p>
<p>My response to that is no, you certainly don’t.  Most people do not realize this, but here’s how it works with a credit card account. You obtain a credit card from the original creditor.  Something happens and you lose your ability to pay so you go into default status. The original creditor waits up to 180 days and then charges off the account. (A charge off is simply an accounting term, it DOES NOT mean that you do not owe the money any longer). At this point, the original creditor has 2 choices.  The first is to try to collect from you by filing a lawsuit; The second is to sell the debt to a junk debt buyer or collection agency.  Often times, the original creditor chooses option 2.</p>
<p>When a credit card account is sold, it is sold not as an individual account, but rather, as part of a group of block of delinquent accounts. Typically, these accounts are sold for mere pennies on the dollar. A group of “good” bad debt (good defined as recently defaulted) may sell for 5 cents on the dollar. It can get sold again and again, each time at lower rates. We have seen instances where $1000 of debt has sold for .25. </p>
<p>So the purchasing junk debt buyer or collection agency then files a lawsuit against you. This is where “but I owe the money” comes into play.  From my standpoint, you may owe the money to the original creditor at the time that you default. If they lend you money or extend credit to you, you do have an obligation to pay it back so you do “owe the money”. However, once you go into default and they charge it off, they have a choice to make. They can sue you or sell the account to a collection agency. If they sue, then maybe you do “owe  the money”.  But if they sell your account, then I don’t believe that you “owe the money” any longer.</p>
<p>Here is my reasoning. You have a credit account and are extended credit. You certainly owe the original creditor something at that point.  Once you go into default, you still “owe the money” to that creditor. I believe, however, that if they sell the account, then you no longer “owe the money” because they have received adequate compensation for you default. When they sell your account they are saying that they no longer want to deal with you and they would like to be compensated for the default. Collection Agency X comes along and gives the original creditor money for your account.  At that point, the original creditor is out of the picture. They have received what they deemed to be adequate and fair compensation for your default.  They would not have sold it otherwise, right?  So if the original creditor is adequately compensated, then you no longer “owe the money” in my opinion.</p>
<p>This isn’t to say that a legal interest such as a credit card account cannot be bought and sold.  Those transactions are certainly legal. I am simply looking at this from a debtor’s standpoint. If you pay anything to that collection agency, if you believe that you “owe the money” , you are simply paying pure profit to that collection agency. After all, they paid only pennies on the dollar for your account. After the first $30 or so, any money that you pay to them is pure profit.  Do you really “owe the money”?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/02/%e2%80%9cbut-i-owe-the-money%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDCPA &#8211; Instant Success Story</title>
		<link>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/02/fdcpa-instant-success-story/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/02/fdcpa-instant-success-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Artim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CC Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collection Agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collection agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDCPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob and Mary (fictitiuous names, of course) had a delinquent account with a major credit card company. The credit card company hired a collection agency to assist in collection of the debt.  The collection agency placed a few calls to Bob and Mary, who chose not to speak with them. Undeterred, the collection agency called [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob and Mary (fictitiuous names, of course) had a delinquent account with a major credit card company. The credit card company hired a collection agency to assist in collection of the debt.  The collection agency placed a few calls to Bob and Mary, who chose not to speak with them. Undeterred, the collection agency called Bob and Mary&#8217;s neighbor and asked them to hand deliver a note to Bob and Mary.  The collector asked the neighbors to write down the  following message : &#8221; This is Joe from XYZ colleciton agency.  I am troubled to hear that you do not want to take my calls. We really need to settle this debt so call me back right away&#8221;.  The neighbor handed the note to Bob and Mary, who fortunately called our office right away.</p>
<p>It is illegal for any debt collector to contact a friend, neighbor, family member or anyone at your place of employment to discuss your debt with them. (They may contact one of these third parties only to locate you, if they have made reasonable efforts at finding you that were not successful). The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) sets forth many rights that consumer or debtors have in regards to delinquent accounts and collection activities that take place as a result thereof.</p>
<p>My partner, Clay Morrow, contacted the collection agency right away and advised them of our representation of Bob and Mary. Clay advised that the activities were illegal and that we would be bringing a claim against them.  The collection agency knew that their actions were illegal so there wasn&#8217;t much of a fight. They do these things because they know that 1) these tactics are often successful and 2) that most people will not bother to consult an attorney.</p>
<p>Within a matter of 10 days, Clay was able to obtain the full amount of the statutory damages ($1000) plus attorney fees for Bob and Mary.  Clay was also able to settle the underlying debt with the original credit card company for a small fraction of the actual debt.  Great job Clay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/02/fdcpa-instant-success-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Worst Credit Card Lawsuit Defenses Ever</title>
		<link>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/02/the-worst-credit-card-lawsuit-defenses-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/02/the-worst-credit-card-lawsuit-defenses-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Artim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CC Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have encountered many people who have tried to defend credit card cases themselves in the past few months and am very surprised at some of the defenses that they think will work. The following are a few of the worst defenses that I have seen, and an explanation as to why they are such bad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have encountered many people who have tried to defend credit card cases themselves in the past few months and am very surprised at some of the defenses that they think will work. The following are a few of the worst defenses that I have seen, and an explanation as to why they are such bad defenses.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">I’ve never had an account with you</span>.</p>
<p>This means absolutely nothing in a court of law. The right to sue someone is a legal interest. A legal interest can be sold, at any time, at any price, to anyone.  While it may be true that you did not have an account with the collection agency, that doesn’t mean that they cannot sue you on a delinquent account. (Whether they can prove that they bought the account is another story and is the basis for much of our success in defending collection agency lawsuits).</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">I tried to pay, but they wouldn’t work with me</span>.</p>
<p>This may be the worst defense ever.   “I tried to pay…”  this is called an admission. Who pays on something that they do not owe?  No one.  The admission here is that you did have an account with someone and that you are in default on that account.  In a nutshell, it means that you lose your lawsuit. To be clear, once you are in default the creditor or collection agency does not have to accept any payment other than payment in full.  You do not get to set the terms of repayment.  Its not up to you to decide how much you can or are willing to pay. In addition, a court typically does not determine payment arrangements. Instead, a court determines<em> if</em> you owe anything and then how much. Repayment afterwards is up to the parties to handle.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">My divorce decree says that I don’t have to pay</span>.</p>
<p>This is mixing apples and doritos. A divorce decree or order is issued by a family court. While it has a binding effect between the spouses (ex spouse’s I should say) it does not bind other parties. The credit card company (or collection agency) is not bound by this divorce decree or order because its case is in civil court, which is different. The credit card company can sue the named cardholder only, not anyone else, and the divorce decree will not prevent that. What may happen is that the credit card company sues the cardholder and wins its case. The cardholder could then go to family court and have the other person found in contempt for not handling the account.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">I hired a debt settlement company</span>.</p>
<p>Perhaps the second worst defense, and, the absolute worst move that you could make, period. (This author firmly believes that debt settlement companies are useless and clearly not worth the outrageous fees that you pay them). As stated above, a credit card company or collection agency does not have to accept any payment other than payment in full, once you are in default. Debt settlement companies cannot stop lawsuits from occurring and are not equipped to help you respond to a credit card lawsuit. DO NOT TAKE LEGAL ADVICE FROM A DEBT SETTLEMENT COMPANY.  Again, don&#8217;t hire them to begin with and you won&#8217;t have to worry about heeding their legal advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/02/the-worst-credit-card-lawsuit-defenses-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reduce debt by 70% and other false claims</title>
		<link>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/02/reduce-debt-by-70-and-other-false-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/02/reduce-debt-by-70-and-other-false-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Artim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The advertisements for debt settlement companies are all over the radio and television.   “Information the Credit Card companies don’t want you to know” and  “You are entitled to lower your credit card debt by 70%”.  “We can lower your payments substantially and cut your debt in half”.  “Be debt free in less than a year”. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The advertisements for debt settlement companies are all over the radio and television.   “Information the Credit Card companies don’t want you to know” and  “You are entitled to lower your credit card debt by 70%”.  “We can lower your payments substantially and cut your debt in half”.  “Be debt free in less than a year”. The words fraud and scam come to mind when I hear these phrases.</p>
<p>If you have ever heard the saying that its too good to be true, then it likely is. These ads fit that description exactly. You are not “entitled “ to lower your credit card debt under any law  that I am aware of.  “We can cut your debt in half”, well, only in very extreme and lucky circumstances.  Cutting the debt to 70% is a more reasonable goal (unless you are dealing with a debt buyer and not the original creditor. You can get a better reduction, but you should not pay anything to them) and this sort of reduction only applies where you can pay a lump sum or make substantial monthly payments.  “Be debt free in less than a year”? Only if you file bankruptcy or hit the lottery.</p>
<p>The truth of the matter is that these claims are false, misleading, and in my opinion, fraudulent. These claims are merely a sales pitch to get you to hire a debt settlement company. They know that you are having financial difficulties and will do anything to get out of it. The worst part about these false claims isn’t that they can’t back them up and make them come true. No, the worst part is that they charge you an outrageous fee when you sign on with the company, usually a large percentage of the debt (I have seen upwards of 20%) and an additional monthly fee.  The fee is typically paid up front,<em> before any creditors are paid</em>.</p>
<p>Here’s how the debt settlement companies work. They promise to reduce your debt. You hire them. They arrange for you to make payments to their account. When the account builds up enough money, they contact creditors one by one and try to settle cases. To be blunt, this is a horrible idea.  What do you think is happening while you are paying into the account? The creditors are getting upset and are filing lawsuits against you, all the while, the interest continues to accrue at a rate approaching 30%.</p>
<p>Let’s look at a hypothetical situation. Mike owes $25000 in debt to credit card companies. He hires XYZ debt settlement company to work on his debt problems. They establish an account, he pays $500 per month to the account. Since their fee is 20% (that would be $5000 here), and they get paid first, the first 10 payments are solely to pay the debt settlement company. I have to shoot out a common sense question here, is that money well spent? How much interest accrued during that 10 months? How many lawsuits were filed during that 10 months?  Even though they may tell you otherwise, signing on with a debt settlement company does not stop a creditor from filing a lawsuit. To the contrary, it may expedite the filing of the lawsuit because many creditors do not work with debt settlement companies.</p>
<p>The moral of the story here is to contact a consumer attorney in your area if you are faced with credit card debt. There are a number of issues that need to be reviewed, including who the creditor is, how old the debt is, who is representing the creditor, whether the debt has been sold, on and on. Perhaps negotiation is the way to go. On the other hand, perhaps defending a lawsuit is the way to go. Bankruptcy is always an option to consider. Spend the time to consult with a consumer attorney if you are struggling with credit card debt.  Hire the debt settlement company, and you are simply burning money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/02/reduce-debt-by-70-and-other-false-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Debt Settlement Scam</title>
		<link>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/02/another-debt-settlement-scam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/02/another-debt-settlement-scam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Artim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Potential Client X sent an email to me today advising that she was in trouble.  She has several credit cards in default, so she hired a debt settlement company to assist her. (This is always a HUGE mistake as all debt settlement companies are either scams or not worth the exhorbitant fees that you pay [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Potential Client X sent an email to me today advising that she was in trouble.  She has several credit cards in default, so she hired a debt settlement company to assist her. (This is always a HUGE mistake as all debt settlement companies are either scams or not worth the exhorbitant fees that you pay them). The company is charging her 20% of her outstanding debt and have asked her to make monthly payments of $500 into their account. Because her total debt is about $40000, their fee is going to be $8000!  (I wish that I could charge that much, but my conscience doesn&#8217;t allow me to do that).  The best part (maybe the worst part) is that the company gets its money first.  The first 16 monthly payments go to the settlement company before they do any work.  Isn&#8217;t that just great!  Of course, all of the credit card companies are going to wait this out until the company gets its fee, right? </p>
<p>The sad part, if it could get any sadder, is that the company told potential Client X that the credit card companies would not sue her because they were involved now. They mentioned that if a lawsuit did come, that they would take care of it.</p>
<p>Well, the lawsuit from Citibank did arrive. Potential Client X notified the company and they advised her that they would handle it.  They advised her to send an extra $125 per month to make payments to Citibank.  Potential Client X complied, only to find that while the funds did go to Citibank, the debt settlement company did not respond to the lawsuit and a judgment was entered against her for the full amount plus attorney fees. They told her that they thought Citibank would like to have 6 months of payments and then they would review her case, because &#8221; that&#8217;s how they have handled things in the past&#8221;.</p>
<p>This entire fiasco could have been averted if Potential Client X had contact my office, or the office of another consumer attorney, rather than the debt settlement company.  Moral of the story, all debt settlement companies are a waste of your time and money.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Even if they get a reduction of 40%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/02/another-debt-settlement-scam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fair Debt Collection under the FDCPA</title>
		<link>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/01/fair-debt-collection-under-the-fdcpa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/01/fair-debt-collection-under-the-fdcpa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greg Artim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collection agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDCPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal Threats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We hear about unsavory collection agencies on a daily basis. They either make illegal threats, such as wage garnishment, pressing fraud charges or jail time, or, they harass you by calling you names like deadbeat, ignorant, loser and so forth.  Then, they contact your family and friends to try to get them to pay the debt [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We hear about unsavory collection agencies on a daily basis. They either make illegal threats, such as wage garnishment, pressing fraud charges or jail time, or, they harass you by calling you names like deadbeat, ignorant, loser and so forth.  Then, they contact your family and friends to try to get them to pay the debt for you, or, they contact your neighbors and employer with questions about the debt. </p>
<p>All of the above actions are illegal under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDPCA for short) is a federal law that governs what a debt collector may do or say when it is attempting to collect a debt.</p>
<p>A debt collector may not threaten to take any action that is illegal, period. In the above examples, wage garnishment is a big one that we see quite often. To be clear, a debt collector may not garnish your wages in Pennsylvania for a credit card debt. There are no ifs, ands or buts to that statement. Therefore, if a debt collector makes such a threat, it is illegal and you may have a claim against them for their unfair practices.</p>
<p>Again, referring to the above examples, we hear of debt collectors who contact family, friends, employers and neighbors about outstanding debt. This type of activity is <em>usually</em> illegal, but not always.</p>
<p>To explain, generally, a debt collector may not speak with or contact anyone else about your debts. For the most part, an employer may never be contacted about a credit card debt. With regards to friends, family and neighbors, the same is true but with one general exception.</p>
<p>If a debt collector cannot find you, they may contact others to ascertain your location and contact information.  Again, they have this permission only if they cannot find you. They may not speak with others about the nature of their business, they may not tell anyone that you allegedly owe a debt.  Their sole purpose in contacting a friend, neighbor or family member can be only to locate you.  If the debt collector has a valid address and phone number for you, they have no reason or right to contact anyone else about your alleged debt.  Such an action would be illegal.</p>
<p>If one of the above examples should happen to you, please know that you have rights under the FDCPA. Our firm, specifically through my partner, Clay Morrow, can bring a claim against the debt collector for its illegal activities. Generally, you are entitled to a statutory damage amount $1000 AND you receive your reasonable attorney fees for prosecution of the claim. In that regard, we do not charge an up-front fee to pursue these claims on your behalf.</p>
<p>If a debt collector has threatened you, or discussed your alleged debt with someone else, please contact our office right away so that we can begin a claim for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pacreditcardlaws.com/2010/01/fair-debt-collection-under-the-fdcpa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
